acepb
12-19 07:37 PM
I have entered before on AP with 1 month left on the validity without any issues through Newark
wallpaper Julie Benz – Dr. Stephanie
vinabath
08-30 09:12 AM
is this a visa renewal??
Blog Feeds
01-15 11:20 AM
Center for Immigration Studies head Mark Krikorian blogs today on the subject: Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was invented precisely for cases like Haiti today � when a natural disaster is so devastating that illegal immigrants from that country temporarily can't be deported. And there are already several members of Congress calling on the administration to grant TPS, and rightly so. He does criticize TPS, of course. And he suggests that if TPS is granted, it will encourage waves of boat people. Of course, with 100,000+ likely dead and mass starvation on the near term horizon, people will be taking to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/antiimmigration-leader-admits-tps-for-haitians-is-needed.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/antiimmigration-leader-admits-tps-for-haitians-is-needed.html)
2011 Julie Benz
abc
06-14 02:21 PM
With this mejob workload of I-140 filiing in next 2 months, I-140 procesing times will again retrogress.
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
more...
TUnlimited
10-31 05:23 PM
Yeeeees! You are in huge trouble! Some devils stole your identity and trying to compromize you any way they want! Is your bank account already empty? Did your credit score fell under 100? Have you got any collections? Not yet? Great! Everything is coming to you! Angry spirits will get you. :D:D:D
Happy Halloween, dude!
Happy Halloween, dude!
H1bHelpNeeded
05-03 02:18 PM
I have a difficult situation , i have a H1B expiring in 5 Days and also ending the 6 yr period. My company is filing a H1B to L1A conversion application from US in premium processing
1. Is it legal to stay until L1A is approved? for duration of 2 weeks until L1 Premium processing is done
2. In L1A is rejected, would it be legal to travel citing the rejection of L1 petition
Please help me with any insight you may have
Just want to add that , the company is asking me to go on an admin leave for the period
1. Is it legal to stay until L1A is approved? for duration of 2 weeks until L1 Premium processing is done
2. In L1A is rejected, would it be legal to travel citing the rejection of L1 petition
Please help me with any insight you may have
Just want to add that , the company is asking me to go on an admin leave for the period
more...
bhartigorkar
07-23 06:07 PM
I really like to make this type of graphic.
Hope u like this.
http://a.imageshack.us/img20/2739/arttshirt.jpg
Hope u like this.
http://a.imageshack.us/img20/2739/arttshirt.jpg
2010 Actors: Julie Benz
kanakabyraju
08-25 04:40 PM
Now things are not predictable. I prefer premium process with an extra 1000 USD
If you want to travel, yes you should go.
Canada is also an option. I did mine is canada but that was few yrs back
If you want to travel, yes you should go.
Canada is also an option. I did mine is canada but that was few yrs back
more...
raja0076
09-18 06:52 PM
HI All,
I am a Canadian Citizen, Previously i worked on H1, Once i got a full time in Canada came back, but did not return I-94, still valid (not expired).
I had my Nexus card Interview, the American Officer checked previous I-94 and asked if i still worked with the same company, i said no. He took back the I-94 and rejected issuing Nexus card. He mentioned, if i was at a port of entry, i would have been banned from entering, but now i cannot touch you because you are not asking to enter USA. He did mention that, this will not effect my Future TN or H1b applications.
Now all i want to ask from you all are
1.Will this effect my future TN or H1.
2. Will US officials stop me from crossing the border
3. Is USCIS/INS going to see this history and effect my future applications like GC or any type of Visas.
Any information is welcome, or can anybody with similar experience share what happened in the past.
Thank you
I am a Canadian Citizen, Previously i worked on H1, Once i got a full time in Canada came back, but did not return I-94, still valid (not expired).
I had my Nexus card Interview, the American Officer checked previous I-94 and asked if i still worked with the same company, i said no. He took back the I-94 and rejected issuing Nexus card. He mentioned, if i was at a port of entry, i would have been banned from entering, but now i cannot touch you because you are not asking to enter USA. He did mention that, this will not effect my Future TN or H1b applications.
Now all i want to ask from you all are
1.Will this effect my future TN or H1.
2. Will US officials stop me from crossing the border
3. Is USCIS/INS going to see this history and effect my future applications like GC or any type of Visas.
Any information is welcome, or can anybody with similar experience share what happened in the past.
Thank you
hair A10 – Julie Benz as Darla A11
sxk
11-25 08:13 PM
What do one have to do to get a visa appointment in one of the US embassy's in Canada?
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
more...
JeffDG
03-30 11:41 AM
I initially voted in favour of this, but on further reflection, I think this is bad policy and urge others to not support this.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
hot Julie Benz
venkspr
04-03 07:44 AM
You can use Search and compare salary data based on job title, location, company and year using real data. Search is powered using real data from actual job disclosure from fortune 500 companies and more.. - SalaryQuest.com (http://salaryquest.com) to look up the data. It's based on perm an h1b disclosure data. Good luck.
more...
house vamp Darla (Julie Benz),
gparr
July 3rd, 2005, 05:57 PM
Agree with the cropping suggestion and also suggest you bring the highlights down some to bring out the detail in the barn roof and level out the barn. Just did a quick-and-dirty adjustment. You'll get better results from the original.
Gary
Gary